Baseball
Today
Track today's paper bets as results come in, review yesterday's paper performance, then scan current projections by decision, edge, and information stage. No wagers are placed.
Today
Paper bets and results
July 31, 2026
Yesterday
Paper bets and results
July 30, 2026
- Paper bets
- 8
- Paper risked
- 11.7%
- Paper to win
- 10.2%
- Settled
- 8/8
- Paper P/L
- −3.6%
- -$363
Upcoming
Projection status and paper picks
Updated · Times shown in your browser's timezone
- Games
- 8
- Paper bets
- 0
- Watchlist
- 1
- Confirmed
- 1/8
- Paper stake
- $0
joint KellyTotals portfolio risks 0.0% of bankroll4,096 modeled outcomes
- Standalone model
- Coherent run distribution per game
- Joint full Kelly
- 0.0%
- Robust joint Kelly
- 0.0%
- Deployable policy
- 0.0% · $0
Alternate totals are sized together against one bankroll. The robust portfolio blends 50% contemporaneous market distribution with the model, includes a ±0.75-run shared environment stress, then applies 25% Kelly and a 2.0% per-bet cap. Full deployment is constrained below 99.9%.
warnData quality: Projection feature coverage is usable with warnings.5 details
- 2 of 16 probable pitcher starter slots used fallback starter features.
- 7 of 8 projections use pre-lineup information and are published for context only; staking is disabled until both lineups are confirmed.
- 2 of 27 confirmed-lineup batter slots used fallback batter features.
- Some optional model feature artifacts are missing.
- Context feature sources are stale or missing: manager_form.
New York YankeesatChicago Cubs
Will Warren vs. Shota Imanaga
Best current leanNew York Yankees +140New York Yankees is 1.8 pts short of the betting thresholdImplied edge+8.2%Confirmed lineupsWatchlist
New York YankeesatChicago Cubs
Will Warren vs. Shota Imanaga
- Model probability
- 48.1%
- Market probability
- 39.9%
- Implied edge
- +8.2%
- Expected profit
- +$0.15 per $1
Model and sizing details
FanGraphs 46.4% · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 11.0% ($1,103). Paper policy applies a reduced Kelly multiplier and stake cap. No wager is placed.
- Model probability
- 46.2%
- Market probability
- 41.8%
- Implied edge
- +4.4%
- Expected profit
- +$0.08 per $1
Model and sizing details
Model total 9.1 vs. line 10.5 (−1.4) · kalshi · polymarket · Standalone full Kelly 6.0% ($602). This is the ladder edge leader. The highest EV, standalone Kelly, and joint portfolio choices may be different lines. No wager is placed.
Pitcher matchupShota Imanaga uses fastball pitches 17 pts more often
- Fastball
- 57%
- Breaking
- 22%
- Offspeed
- 17%
- Other
- 3%
Mix diversity 64%
- Fastball
- 75%
- Breaking
- 25%
- Offspeed
- 0%
- Other
- 0%
Mix diversity 40%
Research modelNew York Yankees +1.5% paper edge
The earlier-market residual model starts from an earlier no-vig moneyline and tests whether baseball features can improve that market baseline. Historical evaluation has not beaten the market, so this is tracked only for future evidence. It never authorizes or sizes a live or paper bet.
- Paper selection
- New York Yankees +140
- Paper edge
- +1.5%
- Feature coverage
- 93%
- Price captured
Pittsburgh PiratesatCincinnati Reds
Paul Skenes vs. Hunter Greene
Best current leanCincinnati Reds +105Waiting for both confirmed lineupsImplied edge+6.7%Probable startersInfo only
Pittsburgh PiratesatCincinnati Reds
Paul Skenes vs. Hunter Greene
- Model probability
- 53.4%
- Market probability
- 46.7%
- Implied edge
- +6.7%
- Expected profit
- +$0.09 per $1
Model and sizing details
FanGraphs 48.1% · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 9.0% ($902). Paper policy applies a reduced Kelly multiplier and stake cap. No wager is placed.
- Model probability
- 39.5%
- Market probability
- 34.5%
- Implied edge
- +4.9%
- Expected profit
- +$0.14 per $1
Model and sizing details
Model total 8.3 vs. line 8.5 (−0.2) · kalshi · polymarket · Standalone full Kelly 7.3% ($726). This is the ladder edge leader. The highest EV, standalone Kelly, and joint portfolio choices may be different lines. No wager is placed.
Pitcher matchupPaul Skenes uses offspeed pitches 8 pts more often
- Fastball
- 66%
- Breaking
- 26%
- Offspeed
- 8%
- Other
- 0%
Mix diversity 58%
- Fastball
- 67%
- Breaking
- 33%
- Offspeed
- 0%
- Other
- 0%
Mix diversity 45%
Research modelAwaiting a research forecast
The earlier-market residual model starts from an earlier no-vig moneyline and tests whether baseball features can improve that market baseline. Historical evaluation has not beaten the market, so this is tracked only for future evidence. It never authorizes or sizes a live or paper bet.
The next successful research run will populate this section.Philadelphia PhilliesatBaltimore Orioles
Unknown starter vs. Brandon Young
Best current leanUnder 4.5 +625Waiting for complete actionable model inputsImplied edge+5.5%EarlyInfo only
Philadelphia PhilliesatBaltimore Orioles
Unknown starter vs. Brandon Young
- Model probability
- 50.4%
- Market probability
- 48.1%
- Implied edge
- +2.3%
- Expected profit
- −$0.01 per $1
Model and sizing details
FanGraphs 43.9% · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 0.0% ($0). Paper policy applies a reduced Kelly multiplier and stake cap. No wager is placed.
- Model probability
- 18.9%
- Market probability
- 13.5%
- Implied edge
- +5.5%
- Expected profit
- +$0.37 per $1
Model and sizing details
Model total 8.4 vs. line 8.5 (−0.1) · kalshi · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 6.0% ($597). This is the ladder edge leader. The highest EV, standalone Kelly, and joint portfolio choices may be different lines. No wager is placed.
Pitcher matchupPitch-mix comparison is incomplete
No fresh mapped Statcast pitch profile.
- Fastball
- 74%
- Breaking
- 26%
- Offspeed
- 0%
- Other
- 0%
Mix diversity 41%
Research modelAwaiting a research forecast
The earlier-market residual model starts from an earlier no-vig moneyline and tests whether baseball features can improve that market baseline. Historical evaluation has not beaten the market, so this is tracked only for future evidence. It never authorizes or sizes a live or paper bet.
The next successful research run will populate this section.St. Louis CardinalsatToronto Blue Jays
Kyle Leahy vs. Dylan Cease
Best current leanOver 7.5 -103Waiting for complete actionable model inputsImplied edge+11.5%Probable startersInfo only
St. Louis CardinalsatToronto Blue Jays
Kyle Leahy vs. Dylan Cease
- Model probability
- 45.4%
- Market probability
- 38.0%
- Implied edge
- +7.4%
- Expected profit
- +$0.14 per $1
Model and sizing details
FanGraphs 36.4% · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 9.5% ($948). Paper policy applies a reduced Kelly multiplier and stake cap. No wager is placed.
- Model probability
- 61.0%
- Market probability
- 49.5%
- Implied edge
- +11.5%
- Expected profit
- +$0.20 per $1
Model and sizing details
Model total 8.8 vs. line 8.5 (+0.3) · kalshi · polymarket · Standalone full Kelly 20.8% ($2,077). This is the ladder edge leader. The highest EV, standalone Kelly, and joint portfolio choices may be different lines. No wager is placed.
Pitcher matchupDylan Cease uses fastball pitches 8 pts more often
- Fastball
- 37%
- Breaking
- 47%
- Offspeed
- 15%
- Other
- 0%
Mix diversity 73%
- Fastball
- 46%
- Breaking
- 41%
- Offspeed
- 14%
- Other
- 0%
Mix diversity 71%
Research modelAwaiting a research forecast
The earlier-market residual model starts from an earlier no-vig moneyline and tests whether baseball features can improve that market baseline. Historical evaluation has not beaten the market, so this is tracked only for future evidence. It never authorizes or sizes a live or paper bet.
The next successful research run will populate this section.Chicago White SoxatTampa Bay Rays
Erick Fedde vs. Nick Martinez
Best current leanOver 9.5 +165Waiting for complete actionable model inputsImplied edge+4.6%Probable startersInfo only
Chicago White SoxatTampa Bay Rays
Erick Fedde vs. Nick Martinez
- Model probability
- 44.1%
- Market probability
- 42.8%
- Implied edge
- +1.3%
- Expected profit
- −$0.01 per $1
Model and sizing details
FanGraphs 38.3% · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 0.0% ($0). Paper policy applies a reduced Kelly multiplier and stake cap. No wager is placed.
- Model probability
- 41.5%
- Market probability
- 36.9%
- Implied edge
- +4.6%
- Expected profit
- +$0.10 per $1
Model and sizing details
Model total 8.5 vs. line 8.5 (+0.0) · kalshi · polymarket · Standalone full Kelly 6.1% ($610). This is the ladder edge leader. The highest EV, standalone Kelly, and joint portfolio choices may be different lines. No wager is placed.
Pitcher matchupErick Fedde uses breaking pitches 27 pts more often
- Fastball
- 54%
- Breaking
- 33%
- Offspeed
- 6%
- Other
- 6%
Mix diversity 61%
- Fastball
- 69%
- Breaking
- 6%
- Offspeed
- 25%
- Other
- 0%
Mix diversity 55%
Research modelAwaiting a research forecast
The earlier-market residual model starts from an earlier no-vig moneyline and tests whether baseball features can improve that market baseline. Historical evaluation has not beaten the market, so this is tracked only for future evidence. It never authorizes or sizes a live or paper bet.
The next successful research run will populate this section.Arizona DiamondbacksatCleveland Guardians
Mitch Bratt vs. Tanner Bibee
Best current leanUnder 4.5 +625Waiting for complete actionable model inputsImplied edge+5.5%EarlyInfo only
Arizona DiamondbacksatCleveland Guardians
Mitch Bratt vs. Tanner Bibee
- Model probability
- 46.7%
- Market probability
- 43.8%
- Implied edge
- +2.9%
- Expected profit
- +$0.02 per $1
Model and sizing details
FanGraphs 47.2% · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 1.9% ($191). Paper policy applies a reduced Kelly multiplier and stake cap. No wager is placed.
- Model probability
- 19.0%
- Market probability
- 13.5%
- Implied edge
- +5.5%
- Expected profit
- +$0.38 per $1
Model and sizing details
Model total 8.4 vs. line 9.5 (−1.1) · kalshi · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 6.0% ($604). This is the ladder edge leader. The highest EV, standalone Kelly, and joint portfolio choices may be different lines. No wager is placed.
Pitcher matchupPitch-mix comparison is incomplete
No fresh mapped Statcast pitch profile.
- Fastball
- 69%
- Breaking
- 21%
- Offspeed
- 10%
- Other
- 0%
Mix diversity 56%
Research modelAwaiting a research forecast
The earlier-market residual model starts from an earlier no-vig moneyline and tests whether baseball features can improve that market baseline. Historical evaluation has not beaten the market, so this is tracked only for future evidence. It never authorizes or sizes a live or paper bet.
The next successful research run will populate this section.Miami MarlinsatNew York Mets
Janson Junk vs. Freddy Peralta
Best current leanUnder 4.5 +574Waiting for complete actionable model inputsImplied edge+8.8%Probable startersInfo only
Miami MarlinsatNew York Mets
Janson Junk vs. Freddy Peralta
- Model probability
- 49.9%
- Market probability
- 46.2%
- Implied edge
- +3.7%
- Expected profit
- +$0.02 per $1
Model and sizing details
FanGraphs 39.1% · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 2.2% ($219). Paper policy applies a reduced Kelly multiplier and stake cap. No wager is placed.
- Model probability
- 23.2%
- Market probability
- 14.5%
- Implied edge
- +8.8%
- Expected profit
- +$0.57 per $1
Model and sizing details
Model total 7.8 vs. line 8.5 (−0.7) · kalshi · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 9.9% ($987). This is the ladder edge leader. The highest EV, standalone Kelly, and joint portfolio choices may be different lines. No wager is placed.
Pitcher matchupJanson Junk uses breaking pitches 2 pts more often
- Fastball
- 54%
- Breaking
- 32%
- Offspeed
- 14%
- Other
- 0%
Mix diversity 69%
- Fastball
- 55%
- Breaking
- 30%
- Offspeed
- 14%
- Other
- 1%
Mix diversity 68%
Research modelAwaiting a research forecast
The earlier-market residual model starts from an earlier no-vig moneyline and tests whether baseball features can improve that market baseline. Historical evaluation has not beaten the market, so this is tracked only for future evidence. It never authorizes or sizes a live or paper bet.
The next successful research run will populate this section.Washington NationalsatAtlanta Braves
Foster Griffin vs. Bryce Elder
Best current leanUnder 2.5 +3021Waiting for complete actionable model inputsImplied edge+3.6%Probable startersInfo only
Washington NationalsatAtlanta Braves
Foster Griffin vs. Bryce Elder
- Model probability
- 53.9%
- Market probability
- 52.4%
- Implied edge
- +1.5%
- Expected profit
- −$0.02 per $1
Model and sizing details
FanGraphs 58.0% · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 0.0% ($0). Paper policy applies a reduced Kelly multiplier and stake cap. No wager is placed.
- Model probability
- 6.8%
- Market probability
- 3.1%
- Implied edge
- +3.6%
- Expected profit
- +$1.11 per $1
Model and sizing details
Model total 9.2 vs. line 7.5 (+1.7) · kalshi · kalshi · Standalone full Kelly 3.7% ($369). This is the ladder edge leader. The highest EV, standalone Kelly, and joint portfolio choices may be different lines. No wager is placed.
Pitcher matchupBryce Elder uses fastball pitches 9 pts more often
- Fastball
- 64%
- Breaking
- 23%
- Offspeed
- 12%
- Other
- 1%
Mix diversity 62%
- Fastball
- 74%
- Breaking
- 19%
- Offspeed
- 7%
- Other
- 0%
Mix diversity 51%
Research modelAwaiting a research forecast
The earlier-market residual model starts from an earlier no-vig moneyline and tests whether baseball features can improve that market baseline. Historical evaluation has not beaten the market, so this is tracked only for future evidence. It never authorizes or sizes a live or paper bet.
The next successful research run will populate this section.Schedule
Loading schedule...